1966 Ford Falcon vs. 2001 Subaru Outback
To start off, 2001 Subaru Outback is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Ford Falcon would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Subaru Outback is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2001 Subaru Outback is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Ford Falcon. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Subaru Outback will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Subaru Outback (282 Nm) has 94 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Ford Falcon. (188 Nm). This means 2001 Subaru Outback will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Ford Falcon. 2001 Subaru Outback has automatic transmission and 1966 Ford Falcon has manual transmission. 1966 Ford Falcon will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Subaru Outback will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Ford Falcon | 2001 Subaru Outback | |
| Make | Ford | Subaru |
| Model | Falcon | Outback |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2782 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | boxer |
| Horse Power | 106 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 188 Nm | 282 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 88.9 mm | 89.2 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 74.7 mm | 80 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4730 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1750 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1590 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2530 mm |
