1966 Ford Taunus vs. 2009 Mercedes-Benz C
To start off, 2009 Mercedes-Benz C is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Ford Taunus. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Ford Taunus would be higher. At 1,796 cc, 2009 Mercedes-Benz C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mercedes-Benz C (181 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 143 more horse power than 1966 Ford Taunus. (38 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mercedes-Benz C should accelerate faster than 1966 Ford Taunus. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mercedes-Benz C weights approximately 1985 kg more than 1966 Ford Taunus. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Ford Taunus | 2009 Mercedes-Benz C | |
Make | Ford | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Taunus | C |
Year Released | 1966 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1183 cc | 1796 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 38 HP | 181 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 8.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 845 kg | 2830 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4250 mm | 4590 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1450 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2770 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 62 L |