1966 Holden HD vs. 2008 Mazda 6
To start off, 2008 Mazda 6 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Holden HD. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Holden HD would be higher. At 2,968 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Mazda 6 (212 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 90 more horse power than 1966 Holden HD. (122 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1966 Holden HD. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Holden HD weights approximately 20 kg more than 2008 Mazda 6.
Because 1966 Holden HD is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Holden HD. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Mazda 6 (267 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 30 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Holden HD. (237 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2008 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Holden HD.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Holden HD | 2008 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Holden | Mazda |
Model | HD | 6 |
Year Released | 1966 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2930 cc | 2968 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 122 HP | 212 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 237 Nm | 267 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1180 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 4750 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2680 mm |