1966 Jaguar 420G vs. 1989 Lotus Elan
To start off, 1989 Lotus Elan is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Jaguar 420G. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Jaguar 420G would be higher. At 4,235 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Jaguar 420G is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Jaguar 420G (255 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 90 more horse power than 1989 Lotus Elan. (165 HP @ 6600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Jaguar 420G should accelerate faster than 1989 Lotus Elan. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Jaguar 420G weights approximately 758 kg more than 1989 Lotus Elan. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1966 Jaguar 420G is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Jaguar 420G. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Lotus Elan, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 Jaguar 420G (373 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 172 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Lotus Elan. (201 Nm @ 4200 RPM). This means 1966 Jaguar 420G will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Lotus Elan.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Jaguar 420G | 1989 Lotus Elan | |
Make | Jaguar | Lotus |
Model | 420G | Elan |
Year Released | 1966 | 1989 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4235 cc | 1588 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 255 HP | 165 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 6600 RPM |
Torque | 373 Nm | 201 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 92.1 mm | 80.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 106 mm | 79 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 8.2:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1778 kg | 1020 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5140 mm | 3810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1240 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 2260 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 65 L |