1966 Mercury Cougar vs. 2001 Toyota Tundra

To start off, 2001 Toyota Tundra is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Mercury Cougar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Mercury Cougar would be higher. At 4,728 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Mercury Cougar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Toyota Tundra (245 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 116 more horse power than 1966 Mercury Cougar. (129 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 1966 Mercury Cougar.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

1966 Mercury Cougar 2001 Toyota Tundra
Make Mercury Toyota
Model Cougar Tundra
Year Released 1966 2001
Body Type Coupe Pickup
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4728 cc 4700 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 129 HP 245 HP
Engine RPM 4400 RPM 5200 RPM
Drive Type Rear Rear
Vehicle Length 4990 mm 5530 mm
Vehicle Width 1890 mm 1920 mm
Vehicle Height 1320 mm 1800 mm
Wheelbase Size 2830 mm 3270 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]