1966 MG MGC vs. 2000 SsangYong Korando
To start off, 2000 SsangYong Korando is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 MG MGC. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 MG MGC would be higher. At 2,912 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 MG MGC is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 MG MGC (148 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 2000 SsangYong Korando. (142 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 MG MGC should accelerate faster than 2000 SsangYong Korando.
Because 2000 SsangYong Korando is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 MG MGC. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 SsangYong Korando will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 SsangYong Korando (210 Nm @ 2860 RPM) has 36 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 MG MGC. (174 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2000 SsangYong Korando will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 MG MGC.
Compare all specifications:
1966 MG MGC | 2000 SsangYong Korando | |
Make | MG | SsangYong |
Model | MGC | Korando |
Year Released | 1966 | 2000 |
Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2912 cc | 2295 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 142 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 174 Nm | 210 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2860 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4340 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1850 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2490 mm |