1966 Riley Kestrel vs. 1967 Riley Kestrel
To start off, 1967 Riley Kestrel is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Riley Kestrel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Riley Kestrel would be higher. Both 1966 Riley Kestrel and 1967 Riley Kestrel are equipped with a 1,098 cc engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 53 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Riley Kestrel weights approximately 3 kg more than 1966 Riley Kestrel.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, both vehicles can yield 83 Nm of torque. So under normal driving conditions, the ability to climb up hills and pull heavy equipment should be relatively similar for both vehicles.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Riley Kestrel | 1967 Riley Kestrel | |
| Make | Riley | Riley |
| Model | Kestrel | Kestrel |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1967 |
| Engine Size | 1098 cc | 1098 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 53 HP | 53 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 83 Nm | 83 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 2500 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.3:1 | 8.3:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 885 kg | 888 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3730 mm | 3730 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1540 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1350 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2380 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 25 L | 25 L |
