1966 Suzuki Fronte vs. 2002 Acura CL
To start off, 2002 Acura CL is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 3,210 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Acura CL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Acura CL (260 HP @ 6900 RPM) has 225 more horse power than 1966 Suzuki Fronte. (35 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Acura CL should accelerate faster than 1966 Suzuki Fronte. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Acura CL weights approximately 820 kg more than 1966 Suzuki Fronte. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Acura CL (315 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 234 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Suzuki Fronte. (81 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2002 Acura CL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Suzuki Fronte | 2002 Acura CL | |
Make | Suzuki | Acura |
Model | Fronte | CL |
Year Released | 1966 | 2002 |
Engine Size | 785 cc | 3210 cc |
Horse Power | 35 HP | 260 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6900 RPM |
Torque | 81 Nm | 315 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 760 kg | 1580 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 4880 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2250 mm | 2580 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 66 L | 65 L |