1966 Toyota Crown vs. 2003 Nissan X-Trail
To start off, 2003 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Toyota Crown. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Toyota Crown would be higher. At 2,599 cc, 1966 Toyota Crown is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Nissan X-Trail (177 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 79 more horse power than 1966 Toyota Crown. (98 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Nissan X-Trail should accelerate faster than 1966 Toyota Crown. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Toyota Crown weights approximately 85 kg more than 2003 Nissan X-Trail.
Because 2003 Nissan X-Trail is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Toyota Crown. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Nissan X-Trail will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Nissan X-Trail (245 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 45 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Toyota Crown. (200 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2003 Nissan X-Trail will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Toyota Crown.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Toyota Crown | 2003 Nissan X-Trail | |
| Make | Toyota | Nissan |
| Model | Crown | X-Trail |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2599 cc | 2488 cc |
| Horse Power | 98 HP | 177 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 200 Nm | 245 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1375 kg | 1290 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2810 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 60 L |
