1967 Austin A 60 vs. 2012 Audi TT
To start off, 2012 Audi TT is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 1,800 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Audi TT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Audi TT (158 HP) has 98 more horse power than 1967 Austin A 60. (60 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1967 Austin A 60.
Because 1967 Austin A 60 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Austin A 60. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Audi TT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Audi TT (250 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 128 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Austin A 60. (122 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2012 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Austin A 60.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Austin A 60 | 2012 Audi TT | |
Make | Austin | Audi |
Model | A 60 | TT |
Year Released | 1967 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1622 cc | 1800 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 158 HP |
Torque | 122 Nm | 250 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 1500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4201 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1842 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1359 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2469 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 60 L |