1967 BMW 2000 vs. 1985 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 1985 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 BMW 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 BMW 2000 would be higher. At 1,989 cc (4 cylinders), 1967 BMW 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 BMW 2000 weights approximately 400 kg more than 1985 Volkswagen Polo.
Because 1967 BMW 2000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 BMW 2000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Volkswagen Polo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1967 BMW 2000 | 1985 Volkswagen Polo | |
Make | BMW | Volkswagen |
Model | 2000 | Polo |
Year Released | 1967 | 1985 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1989 cc | 1043 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 38 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 700 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 3660 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2340 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 55 L |