1967 Cadillac Calais vs. 1952 Jaguar XK
To start off, 1967 Cadillac Calais is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Cadillac Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Cadillac Calais (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 50 more horse power than 1952 Jaguar XK. (158 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Cadillac Calais should accelerate faster than 1952 Jaguar XK. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Cadillac Calais weights approximately 695 kg more than 1952 Jaguar XK. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Cadillac Calais | 1952 Jaguar XK | |
| Make | Cadillac | Jaguar |
| Model | Calais | XK |
| Year Released | 1967 | 1952 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7029 cc | 3441 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 158 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1990 kg | 1295 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5700 mm | 4430 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1570 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2600 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 63 L |
