1967 Ford Fairlane vs. 2010 Mazda 2
To start off, 2010 Mazda 2 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 4,942 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Ford Fairlane (141 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 67 more horse power than 2010 Mazda 2. (74 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Ford Fairlane should accelerate faster than 2010 Mazda 2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Ford Fairlane weights approximately 279 kg more than 2010 Mazda 2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1967 Ford Fairlane is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Ford Fairlane. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Mazda 2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Ford Fairlane | 2010 Mazda 2 | |
| Make | Ford | Mazda |
| Model | Fairlane | 2 |
| Year Released | 1967 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4942 cc | 1242 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 141 HP | 74 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1404 kg | 1125 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5110 mm | 3930 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2500 mm |
