1967 Isuzu Bellel vs. 2010 Volkswagen Eos
To start off, 2010 Volkswagen Eos is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Isuzu Bellel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Isuzu Bellel would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Volkswagen Eos is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Volkswagen Eos (200 HP) has 119 more horse power than 1967 Isuzu Bellel. (81 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Volkswagen Eos should accelerate faster than 1967 Isuzu Bellel. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Volkswagen Eos weights approximately 295 kg more than 1967 Isuzu Bellel. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Volkswagen Eos (280 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 118 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Isuzu Bellel. (162 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2010 Volkswagen Eos will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Isuzu Bellel.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Isuzu Bellel | 2010 Volkswagen Eos | |
Make | Isuzu | Volkswagen |
Model | Bellel | Eos |
Year Released | 1967 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 2000 cc |
Horse Power | 81 HP | 200 HP |
Torque | 162 Nm | 280 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 1800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1295 kg | 1590 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4409 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1791 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1443 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2578 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 55 L |