1967 Jaguar 240 vs. 2004 Mazda 3
To start off, 2004 Mazda 3 is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Jaguar 240. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Jaguar 240 would be higher. At 2,482 cc (6 cylinders), 1967 Jaguar 240 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Jaguar 240 (131 HP @ 5550 RPM) has 48 more horse power than 2004 Mazda 3. (83 HP @ 5700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Jaguar 240 should accelerate faster than 2004 Mazda 3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Jaguar 240 weights approximately 285 kg more than 2004 Mazda 3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1967 Jaguar 240 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Jaguar 240. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mazda 3 (230 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 27 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Jaguar 240. (203 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 2004 Mazda 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Jaguar 240.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Jaguar 240 | 2004 Mazda 3 | |
Make | Jaguar | Mazda |
Model | 240 | 3 |
Year Released | 1967 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2482 cc | 1349 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 131 HP | 83 HP |
Engine RPM | 5550 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Torque | 203 Nm | 230 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3700 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 83 mm | 76 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 76.5 mm | 76.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 11.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1440 kg | 1155 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4600 mm | 4430 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2740 mm | 2680 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 12.1 L/100km | 7.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 55 L |