1967 Mazda Cosmo vs. 1997 Proton Tiara
To start off, 1997 Proton Tiara is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 1,964 cc, 1967 Mazda Cosmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Mazda Cosmo (93 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 1997 Proton Tiara. (59 HP @ 6200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Mazda Cosmo should accelerate faster than 1997 Proton Tiara. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Mazda Cosmo weights approximately 160 kg more than 1997 Proton Tiara. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1967 Mazda Cosmo (133 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 43 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Proton Tiara. (90 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 1967 Mazda Cosmo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Proton Tiara.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Mazda Cosmo | 1997 Proton Tiara | |
| Make | Mazda | Proton |
| Model | Cosmo | Tiara |
| Year Released | 1967 | 1997 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1964 cc | 1124 cc |
| Horse Power | 93 HP | 59 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 6200 RPM |
| Torque | 133 Nm | 90 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 940 kg | 780 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 3530 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1530 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1170 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2290 mm |
