1967 Mazda Cosmo vs. 2011 Lotus Exige
To start off, 2011 Lotus Exige is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 1,964 cc, 1967 Mazda Cosmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Lotus Exige (257 HP @ 8000 RPM) has 164 more horse power than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. (93 HP @ 7000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Lotus Exige should accelerate faster than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Mazda Cosmo weights approximately 31 kg more than 2011 Lotus Exige.
Let's talk about torque, 2011 Lotus Exige (236 Nm @ 6000 RPM) has 103 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. (133 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2011 Lotus Exige will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Mazda Cosmo.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Mazda Cosmo | 2011 Lotus Exige | |
Make | Mazda | Lotus |
Model | Cosmo | Exige |
Year Released | 1967 | 2011 |
Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 1964 cc | 1800 cc |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 257 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 8000 RPM |
Torque | 133 Nm | 236 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 940 kg | 909 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 3797 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1727 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1170 mm | 1158 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2299 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 57 L | 44 L |