1967 MG 1100 vs. 1983 Zastava 102
To start off, 1983 Zastava 102 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 MG 1100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 MG 1100 would be higher. At 1,299 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Zastava 102 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 MG 1100 (53 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 1983 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1967 MG 1100 should accelerate faster than 1983 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 MG 1100 weights approximately 55 kg more than 1983 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1983 Zastava 102 (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 11 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 MG 1100. (84 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1983 Zastava 102 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 MG 1100.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 MG 1100 | 1983 Zastava 102 | |
| Make | MG | Zastava |
| Model | 1100 | 102 |
| Year Released | 1967 | 1983 |
| Engine Size | 1098 cc | 1299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 53 HP | 49 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 84 Nm | 95 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 825 kg | 770 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3730 mm | 3500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2160 mm |
