1967 Reliant Rebel vs. 2012 Nissan Leaf
To start off, 2012 Nissan Leaf is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Reliant Rebel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Reliant Rebel would be higher.
Because 1967 Reliant Rebel is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Reliant Rebel. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Nissan Leaf, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Reliant Rebel | 2012 Nissan Leaf | |
| Make | Reliant | Nissan |
| Model | Rebel | Leaf |
| Year Released | 1967 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Horse Power | 31 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Single Speed |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 3710 mm | 4445 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1549 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2270 mm | 2700 mm |
