1968 Audi 100 vs. 1982 Dodge Omni
To start off, 1982 Dodge Omni is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Audi 100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Audi 100 would be higher. At 1,760 cc (4 cylinders), 1968 Audi 100 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Audi 100 weights approximately 97 kg more than 1982 Dodge Omni.
Because 1968 Audi 100 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Audi 100. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Dodge Omni, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Audi 100 | 1982 Dodge Omni | |
Make | Audi | Dodge |
Model | 100 | Omni |
Year Released | 1968 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1760 cc | 1716 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 0 HP |
Top Speed | 172 km/hour | 146 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1092 kg | 995 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4630 mm | 4400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1300 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2530 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 58 L | 49 L |