1968 Austin-Healey Sprite vs. 2012 Toyota Highlander
To start off, 2012 Toyota Highlander is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Austin-Healey Sprite. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Austin-Healey Sprite would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Toyota Highlander is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Toyota Highlander weights approximately 1391 kg more than 1968 Austin-Healey Sprite.
Because 2012 Toyota Highlander is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1968 Austin-Healey Sprite. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Toyota Highlander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Austin-Healey Sprite | 2012 Toyota Highlander | |
| Make | Austin-Healey | Toyota |
| Model | Sprite | Highlander |
| Year Released | 1968 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Roadster | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1275 cc | 3500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 280 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 714 kg | 2105 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3490 mm | 4796 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1350 mm | 1910 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1230 mm | 1760 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2789 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 65 L |
