1968 Fiat Dino vs. 1999 Holden Maloo
To start off, 1999 Holden Maloo is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Fiat Dino. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Fiat Dino would be higher. At 5,699 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Holden Maloo is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1968 Fiat Dino is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Fiat Dino. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Holden Maloo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Holden Maloo (542 Nm) has 322 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Fiat Dino. (220 Nm). This means 1999 Holden Maloo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Fiat Dino.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Fiat Dino | 1999 Holden Maloo | |
Make | Fiat | Holden |
Model | Dino | Maloo |
Year Released | 1968 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2418 cc | 5699 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 177 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 220 Nm | 542 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 3 seats |