1968 Ford Fairlane vs. 2005 Honda CR-V
To start off, 2005 Honda CR-V is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 5,766 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Honda CR-V (153 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 1968 Ford Fairlane. (152 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Honda CR-V should accelerate faster than 1968 Ford Fairlane. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Honda CR-V weights approximately 20 kg more than 1968 Ford Fairlane. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Honda CR-V is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1968 Ford Fairlane. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Honda CR-V will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Ford Fairlane | 2005 Honda CR-V | |
Make | Ford | Honda |
Model | Fairlane | CR-V |
Year Released | 1968 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5766 cc | 1996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 152 HP | 153 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 1420 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2540 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 58 L |