1968 Lotus Elan vs. 1965 Willys-Overland Aero-Willys 2600
To start off, 1968 Lotus Elan is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Willys-Overland Aero-Willys 2600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Willys-Overland Aero-Willys 2600 would be higher. At 2,638 cc (6 cylinders), 1965 Willys-Overland Aero-Willys 2600 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 108 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Willys-Overland Aero-Willys 2600 weights approximately 658 kg more than 1968 Lotus Elan.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Lotus Elan | 1965 Willys-Overland Aero-Willys 2600 | |
| Make | Lotus | Willys-Overland |
| Model | Elan | Aero-Willys 2600 |
| Year Released | 1968 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1558 cc | 2638 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 108 HP | 108 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 702 kg | 1360 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3690 mm | 4820 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1850 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1170 mm | 1530 mm |
