1968 Renault 4 vs. 2009 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 2009 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Renault 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Renault 4 would be higher. At 4,664 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Toyota 4Runner (260 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 227 more horse power than 1968 Renault 4. (33 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Toyota 4Runner should accelerate faster than 1968 Renault 4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Toyota 4Runner weights approximately 705 kg more than 1968 Renault 4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Toyota 4Runner is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Toyota 4Runner. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1968 Renault 4, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Renault 4 | 2009 Toyota 4Runner | |
| Make | Renault | Toyota |
| Model | 4 | 4Runner |
| Year Released | 1968 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 747 cc | 4664 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 33 HP | 260 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 650 kg | 1355 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 4810 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1920 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1770 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2800 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.8 L/100km | 14 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 38 L | 87 L |
