1968 Zastava 850 K vs. 2013 Honda CR-Z
To start off, 2013 Honda CR-Z is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Zastava 850 K. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Zastava 850 K would be higher. At 1,497 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Honda CR-Z is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Honda CR-Z (120 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 85 more horse power than 1968 Zastava 850 K. (35 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Honda CR-Z should accelerate faster than 1968 Zastava 850 K. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Honda CR-Z weights approximately 341 kg more than 1968 Zastava 850 K. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1968 Zastava 850 K is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Zastava 850 K. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Honda CR-Z, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Zastava 850 K | 2013 Honda CR-Z | |
| Make | Zastava | Honda |
| Model | 850 K | CR-Z |
| Year Released | 1968 | 2013 |
| Engine Size | 848 cc | 1497 cc |
| Horse Power | 35 HP | 120 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 855 kg | 1196 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3740 mm | 4079 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1740 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1394 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2435 mm |
