1969 Austin 3-Litre vs. 2010 Mazda B4000

To start off, 2010 Mazda B4000 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Austin 3-Litre. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Austin 3-Litre would be higher. At 4,034 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Mazda B4000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mazda B4000 (207 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 83 more horse power than 1969 Austin 3-Litre. (124 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mazda B4000 should accelerate faster than 1969 Austin 3-Litre. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Austin 3-Litre weights approximately 310 kg more than 2010 Mazda B4000.

Because 2010 Mazda B4000 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1969 Austin 3-Litre. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Mazda B4000 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Mazda B4000 (323 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 105 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Austin 3-Litre. (218 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2010 Mazda B4000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Austin 3-Litre.

Compare all specifications:

1969 Austin 3-Litre 2010 Mazda B4000
Make Austin Mazda
Model 3-Litre B4000
Year Released 1969 2010
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2912 cc 4034 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 124 HP 207 HP
Engine RPM 4500 RPM 5250 RPM
Torque 218 Nm 323 Nm
Torque RPM 3000 RPM 3000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Diesel
Drive Type Rear 4WD
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1490 kg 1180 kg
Vehicle Length 4720 mm 5160 mm
Vehicle Width 1700 mm 1790 mm
Vehicle Height 1450 mm 1720 mm
Wheelbase Size 2940 mm 3200 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 65 L 74 L