1969 Austin Mini Clubman vs. 1982 Pontiac Firebird
To start off, 1982 Pontiac Firebird is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Austin Mini Clubman. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Austin Mini Clubman would be higher. At 4,996 cc (8 cylinders), 1982 Pontiac Firebird is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1982 Pontiac Firebird is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Pontiac Firebird. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1969 Austin Mini Clubman, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1982 Pontiac Firebird has automatic transmission and 1969 Austin Mini Clubman has manual transmission. 1969 Austin Mini Clubman will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1982 Pontiac Firebird will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Austin Mini Clubman | 1982 Pontiac Firebird | |
Make | Austin | Pontiac |
Model | Mini Clubman | Firebird |
Year Released | 1969 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 998 cc | 4996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 39 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |