1969 Austin Mini Clubman vs. 2004 Mazda Tribute
To start off, 2004 Mazda Tribute is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Austin Mini Clubman. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Austin Mini Clubman would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Mazda Tribute is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mazda Tribute (130 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 91 more horse power than 1969 Austin Mini Clubman. (39 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mazda Tribute should accelerate faster than 1969 Austin Mini Clubman. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mazda Tribute weights approximately 748 kg more than 1969 Austin Mini Clubman. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mazda Tribute (183 Nm) has 112 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Austin Mini Clubman. (71 Nm). This means 2004 Mazda Tribute will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Austin Mini Clubman.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Austin Mini Clubman | 2004 Mazda Tribute | |
Make | Austin | Mazda |
Model | Mini Clubman | Tribute |
Year Released | 1969 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 998 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 39 HP | 130 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 71 Nm | 183 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 64.6 mm | 85 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 76.2 mm | 88 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.3:1 | 9.6:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 638 kg | 1386 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3170 mm | 4400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1420 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2630 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 62 L |