1969 Austin Mini Clubman vs. 2012 Holden Commodore
To start off, 2012 Holden Commodore is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Austin Mini Clubman. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Austin Mini Clubman would be higher. At 2,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Holden Commodore (240 HP) has 201 more horse power than 1969 Austin Mini Clubman. (39 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 1969 Austin Mini Clubman.
Because 2012 Holden Commodore is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Holden Commodore. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1969 Austin Mini Clubman, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Holden Commodore (240 Nm) has 169 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Austin Mini Clubman. (71 Nm). This means 2012 Holden Commodore will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Austin Mini Clubman.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Austin Mini Clubman | 2012 Holden Commodore | |
Make | Austin | Holden |
Model | Mini Clubman | Commodore |
Year Released | 1969 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 998 cc | 2564 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 39 HP | 240 HP |
Torque | 71 Nm | 240 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |