1969 BMW 2000 vs. 2011 GMC Acadia
To start off, 2011 GMC Acadia is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 BMW 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 BMW 2000 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 GMC Acadia is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 GMC Acadia weights approximately 1012 kg more than 1969 BMW 2000.
Because 1969 BMW 2000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 BMW 2000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 GMC Acadia, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 BMW 2000 | 2011 GMC Acadia | |
| Make | BMW | GMC |
| Model | 2000 | Acadia |
| Year Released | 1969 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1991 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 288 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 2112 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 5098 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1986 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1849 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 3020 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 83 L |
