1969 Chevrolet Impala vs. 2004 Ford Ranger

To start off, 2004 Ford Ranger is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Chevrolet Impala. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Chevrolet Impala would be higher. At 5,733 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Chevrolet Impala is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Ranger (207 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 1969 Chevrolet Impala. (166 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1969 Chevrolet Impala. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Chevrolet Impala weights approximately 687 kg more than 2004 Ford Ranger.

Because 2004 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1969 Chevrolet Impala. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 Chevrolet Impala (387 Nm) has 64 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Ford Ranger. (323 Nm). This means 1969 Chevrolet Impala will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Ford Ranger.

Compare all specifications:

1969 Chevrolet Impala 2004 Ford Ranger
Make Chevrolet Ford
Model Impala Ranger
Year Released 1969 2004
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 5733 cc 4015 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 166 HP 207 HP
Engine RPM 4000 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 387 Nm 323 Nm
Engine Compression Ratio 11.0:1 9.0:1
Drive Type Rear 4WD
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1895 kg 1208 kg
Vehicle Length 5600 mm 5130 mm
Vehicle Width 2030 mm 1790 mm
Vehicle Height 1370 mm 1730 mm
Wheelbase Size 3100 mm 3200 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 53 L 74 L