1969 Chevrolet Nova vs. 2013 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2013 Cadillac CTS is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Chevrolet Nova. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Chevrolet Nova would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 471 kg more than 1969 Chevrolet Nova.
Because 2013 Cadillac CTS is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1969 Chevrolet Nova. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac CTS will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Chevrolet Nova | 2013 Cadillac CTS | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Cadillac |
| Model | Nova | CTS |
| Year Released | 1969 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2507 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 266 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1280 kg | 1751 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4820 mm | 4859 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1842 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1473 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2880 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 76 L | 68 L |
