1969 Dodge Challenger vs. 1979 Audi Fox
To start off, 1979 Audi Fox is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Dodge Challenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Dodge Challenger would be higher. At 6,286 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Dodge Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Dodge Challenger weights approximately 656 kg more than 1979 Audi Fox.
Because 1969 Dodge Challenger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Dodge Challenger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1979 Audi Fox, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Dodge Challenger | 1979 Audi Fox | |
Make | Dodge | Audi |
Model | Challenger | Fox |
Year Released | 1969 | 1979 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6286 cc | 1271 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1566 kg | 910 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 4390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2550 mm |