1969 Ford Thunderbird vs. 1967 NSU Ro 80
To start off, 1969 Ford Thunderbird is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 NSU Ro 80. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 NSU Ro 80 would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Ford Thunderbird (355 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 241 more horse power than 1967 NSU Ro 80. (114 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Ford Thunderbird should accelerate faster than 1967 NSU Ro 80.
Because 1969 Ford Thunderbird is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Ford Thunderbird. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1967 NSU Ro 80, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 Ford Thunderbird (300 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 138 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 NSU Ro 80. (162 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1969 Ford Thunderbird will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 NSU Ro 80.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Ford Thunderbird | 1967 NSU Ro 80 | |
Make | Ford | NSU |
Model | Thunderbird | Ro 80 |
Year Released | 1969 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7029 cc | 2390 cc |
Horse Power | 355 HP | 114 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 300 Nm | 162 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2870 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 91 L | 37 L |