1969 Holden Belmont vs. 1946 Triumph 1800
To start off, 1969 Holden Belmont is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Triumph 1800. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Triumph 1800 would be higher. At 3,034 cc (6 cylinders), 1969 Holden Belmont is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Holden Belmont (129 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 65 more horse power than 1946 Triumph 1800. (64 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Holden Belmont should accelerate faster than 1946 Triumph 1800. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Holden Belmont weights approximately 183 kg more than 1946 Triumph 1800. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Holden Belmont | 1946 Triumph 1800 | |
| Make | Holden | Triumph |
| Model | Belmont | 1800 |
| Year Released | 1969 | 1946 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3034 cc | 1774 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 129 HP | 64 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1275 kg | 1092 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4290 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1660 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2550 mm |
