1969 Holden Belmont vs. 1999 Mazda B3000

To start off, 1999 Mazda B3000 is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Holden Belmont. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Holden Belmont would be higher. At 3,034 cc (6 cylinders), 1969 Holden Belmont is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Holden Belmont (129 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 24 more horse power than 1999 Mazda B3000. (105 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Holden Belmont should accelerate faster than 1999 Mazda B3000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Holden Belmont weights approximately 111 kg more than 1999 Mazda B3000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1969 Holden Belmont is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Holden Belmont. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Mazda B3000, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 Holden Belmont (247 Nm) has 49 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Mazda B3000. (198 Nm). This means 1969 Holden Belmont will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Mazda B3000.

Compare all specifications: