1969 Jaguar E-Type vs. 2013 Jaguar F-TYPE
To start off, 2013 Jaguar F-TYPE is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Jaguar E-Type. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Jaguar E-Type would be higher. At 4,235 cc (6 cylinders), 1969 Jaguar E-Type is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Jaguar F-TYPE (335 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 110 more horse power than 1969 Jaguar E-Type. (225 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Jaguar F-TYPE should accelerate faster than 1969 Jaguar E-Type. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Jaguar F-TYPE weights approximately 480 kg more than 1969 Jaguar E-Type. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Jaguar E-Type | 2013 Jaguar F-TYPE | |
Make | Jaguar | Jaguar |
Model | E-Type | F-TYPE |
Year Released | 1969 | 2013 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4235 cc | 2995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | W |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 335 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 1880 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 4961 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 2053 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1190 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2909 mm |