1969 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow vs. 1980 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow
To start off, 1980 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow would be higher. At 6,750 cc (8 cylinders), 1980 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow weights approximately 135 kg more than 1969 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow | 1980 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow | |
| Make | Rolls-Royce | Rolls-Royce |
| Model | Silver Shadow | Silver Shadow |
| Year Released | 1969 | 1980 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6230 cc | 6750 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2100 kg | 2235 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5180 mm | 5280 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1830 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1520 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 3060 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 15.2 L/100km | 15.2 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 109 L | 107 L |
