1969 Suzuki Fronte vs. 2012 Dodge Ram
To start off, 2012 Dodge Ram is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 5,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Dodge Ram (390 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 370 more horse power than 1969 Suzuki Fronte. (20 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 1969 Suzuki Fronte. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Dodge Ram weights approximately 1978 kg more than 1969 Suzuki Fronte. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Dodge Ram (551 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 514 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Suzuki Fronte. (37 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2012 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Suzuki Fronte | 2012 Dodge Ram | |
Make | Suzuki | Dodge |
Model | Fronte | Ram |
Year Released | 1969 | 2012 |
Engine Size | 356 cc | 5700 cc |
Horse Power | 20 HP | 390 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 37 Nm | 551 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 440 kg | 2418 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3000 mm | 5817 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1300 mm | 2017 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1877 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 1970 mm | 3569 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 66 L | 121 L |