1970 AMC AMX III vs. 2003 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2003 Toyota Tundra is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 AMC AMX III. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 AMC AMX III would be higher. At 6,375 cc (8 cylinders), 1970 AMC AMX III is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1970 AMC AMX III (341 HP) has 154 more horse power than 2003 Toyota Tundra. (187 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1970 AMC AMX III should accelerate faster than 2003 Toyota Tundra.
Because 2003 Toyota Tundra is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1970 AMC AMX III. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Toyota Tundra will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2003 Toyota Tundra has automatic transmission and 1970 AMC AMX III has manual transmission. 1970 AMC AMX III will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 Toyota Tundra will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1970 AMC AMX III | 2003 Toyota Tundra | |
| Make | AMC | Toyota |
| Model | AMX III | Tundra |
| Year Released | 1970 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 6375 cc | 3400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 341 HP | 187 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 3270 mm |
