1970 Cadillac Calais vs. 2003 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 2003 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Cadillac Calais. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Cadillac Calais would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1970 Cadillac Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Toyota 4Runner (242 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 1970 Cadillac Calais. (228 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Toyota 4Runner should accelerate faster than 1970 Cadillac Calais. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1970 Cadillac Calais weights approximately 200 kg more than 2003 Toyota 4Runner.
Compare all specifications:
1970 Cadillac Calais | 2003 Toyota 4Runner | |
Make | Cadillac | Toyota |
Model | Calais | 4Runner |
Year Released | 1970 | 2003 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7734 cc | 3995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 228 HP | 242 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 2100 kg | 1900 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 4810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2800 mm |