1970 Cadillac Sixty vs. 2009 Mazda 6
To start off, 2009 Mazda 6 is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1970 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 6 (272 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 44 more horse power than 1970 Cadillac Sixty. (228 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1970 Cadillac Sixty. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1970 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 1071 kg more than 2009 Mazda 6.
Because 1970 Cadillac Sixty is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1970 Cadillac Sixty. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1970 Cadillac Sixty | 2009 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
Model | Sixty | 6 |
Year Released | 1970 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7734 cc | 3726 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 228 HP | 272 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 2196 kg | 1125 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5810 mm | 4930 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3390 mm | 2800 mm |