1970 Citroen Ami vs. 1963 Zastava 1300
To start off, 1970 Citroen Ami is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Zastava 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Zastava 1300 would be higher. At 1,295 cc (4 cylinders), 1963 Zastava 1300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Zastava 1300 (53 HP) has 18 more horse power than 1970 Citroen Ami. (35 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Zastava 1300 should accelerate faster than 1970 Citroen Ami. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Zastava 1300 weights approximately 360 kg more than 1970 Citroen Ami. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 Zastava 1300 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Zastava 1300. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1970 Citroen Ami, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1970 Citroen Ami | 1963 Zastava 1300 | |
| Make | Citroen | Zastava |
| Model | Ami | 1300 |
| Year Released | 1970 | 1963 |
| Engine Size | 602 cc | 1295 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 35 HP | 53 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 620 kg | 980 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 4040 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2430 mm |
