1970 Matra-Simca M530 vs. 2003 Renault Megane
To start off, 2003 Renault Megane is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Matra-Simca M530. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Matra-Simca M530 would be higher. At 1,996 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Renault Megane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Renault Megane (134 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 63 more horse power than 1970 Matra-Simca M530. (71 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Renault Megane should accelerate faster than 1970 Matra-Simca M530.
Because 1970 Matra-Simca M530 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1970 Matra-Simca M530. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Renault Megane, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Renault Megane (188 Nm) has 60 more torque (in Nm) than 1970 Matra-Simca M530. (128 Nm). This means 2003 Renault Megane will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1970 Matra-Simca M530.
Compare all specifications:
1970 Matra-Simca M530 | 2003 Renault Megane | |
Make | Matra-Simca | Renault |
Model | M530 | Megane |
Year Released | 1970 | 2003 |
Engine Size | 1699 cc | 1996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 71 HP | 134 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 128 Nm | 188 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4200 mm | 4510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1210 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2690 mm |