1970 Triumph 1300 vs. 2012 Mercedes-Benz ML
To start off, 2012 Mercedes-Benz ML is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Triumph 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Triumph 1300 would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Mercedes-Benz ML is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Mercedes-Benz ML (240 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 180 more horse power than 1970 Triumph 1300. (60 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Mercedes-Benz ML should accelerate faster than 1970 Triumph 1300.
Because 2012 Mercedes-Benz ML is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1970 Triumph 1300. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Mercedes-Benz ML will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Mercedes-Benz ML (616 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 517 more torque (in Nm) than 1970 Triumph 1300. (99 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2012 Mercedes-Benz ML will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1970 Triumph 1300.
Compare all specifications:
1970 Triumph 1300 | 2012 Mercedes-Benz ML | |
Make | Triumph | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | 1300 | ML |
Year Released | 1970 | 2012 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1296 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 240 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 99 Nm | 616 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 1600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | AWD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3940 mm | 4803 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 2141 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1796 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2916 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 42 L | 93 L |