1970 Zastava 1300 vs. 1965 ZAZ 966
To start off, 1970 Zastava 1300 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 ZAZ 966. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 ZAZ 966 would be higher. At 1,295 cc (4 cylinders), 1970 Zastava 1300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1970 Zastava 1300 (53 HP) has 26 more horse power than 1965 ZAZ 966. (27 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1970 Zastava 1300 should accelerate faster than 1965 ZAZ 966. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1970 Zastava 1300 weights approximately 240 kg more than 1965 ZAZ 966. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1970 Zastava 1300 (93 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 41 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 ZAZ 966. (52 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 1970 Zastava 1300 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 ZAZ 966.
Compare all specifications:
| 1970 Zastava 1300 | 1965 ZAZ 966 | |
| Make | Zastava | ZAZ |
| Model | 1300 | 966 |
| Year Released | 1970 | 1965 |
| Engine Size | 1295 cc | 887 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 53 HP | 27 HP |
| Torque | 93 Nm | 52 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 2400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 980 kg | 740 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4040 mm | 3740 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1540 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2170 mm |
