1971 BMW Touring vs. 2000 Seat Arosa
To start off, 2000 Seat Arosa is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 BMW Touring. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 BMW Touring would be higher. At 1,573 cc (4 cylinders), 1971 BMW Touring is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Seat Arosa (123 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 38 more horse power than 1971 BMW Touring. (85 HP @ 5700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Seat Arosa should accelerate faster than 1971 BMW Touring. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Seat Arosa weights approximately 259 kg more than 1971 BMW Touring. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1971 BMW Touring (130 Nm) has 13 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Seat Arosa. (117 Nm). This means 1971 BMW Touring will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Seat Arosa.
Compare all specifications:
1971 BMW Touring | 2000 Seat Arosa | |
Make | BMW | Seat |
Model | Touring | Arosa |
Year Released | 1971 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1573 cc | 1359 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 123 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 130 Nm | 117 Nm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1030 kg | 1289 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2850 mm |