1971 Matra-Simca M530 vs. 1996 Honda Integra

To start off, 1996 Honda Integra is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 Matra-Simca M530. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 Matra-Simca M530 would be higher. At 1,834 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Honda Integra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Honda Integra (176 HP) has 105 more horse power than 1971 Matra-Simca M530. (71 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Honda Integra should accelerate faster than 1971 Matra-Simca M530. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Honda Integra weights approximately 264 kg more than 1971 Matra-Simca M530. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1971 Matra-Simca M530 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1971 Matra-Simca M530. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Honda Integra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1996 Honda Integra has automatic transmission and 1971 Matra-Simca M530 has manual transmission. 1971 Matra-Simca M530 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1996 Honda Integra will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: