1971 NSU Ro 80 vs. 2008 Holden UTE
To start off, 2008 Holden UTE is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 NSU Ro 80. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 NSU Ro 80 would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Holden UTE (357 HP) has 242 more horse power than 1971 NSU Ro 80. (115 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 1971 NSU Ro 80.
Because 2008 Holden UTE is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2008 Holden UTE. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1971 NSU Ro 80, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Holden UTE (530 Nm) has 342 more torque (in Nm) than 1971 NSU Ro 80. (188 Nm). This means 2008 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1971 NSU Ro 80.
Compare all specifications:
| 1971 NSU Ro 80 | 2008 Holden UTE | |
| Make | NSU | Holden |
| Model | Ro 80 | UTE |
| Year Released | 1971 | 2008 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1990 cc | 6000 cc |
| Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | V |
| Horse Power | 115 HP | 357 HP |
| Torque | 188 Nm | 530 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
